France’s foreign affairs minister, Jean-Noël Barrot, has strongly criticized the United States for conducting lethal boat strikes in the Caribbean, stating that these actions violate international law. Barrot expressed concern at the G7 summit in Niagara-on-the-Lake, Ont., highlighting that France has a stake in the region through its overseas territories where over a million French citizens reside.
The U.S. military has carried out 19 strikes against suspected drug vessels in the Caribbean and off the Pacific coasts of Latin America, resulting in the deaths of 76 individuals. These strikes are part of efforts to combat drug trafficking, with the U.S. accusing Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro of having ties to drug cartels. President Donald Trump has reportedly authorized covert CIA operations in Venezuela.
Barrot’s remarks align with a CNN report claiming that Britain has halted intelligence sharing with the U.S. from its Caribbean assets due to concerns over the boat strikes. However, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio denied any discussions on the issue during the G7 meetings and refuted the claim that Britain had raised objections directly to him.
Foreign Affairs Minister Anita Anand clarified that Canada is not involved in providing intelligence for the U.S. strikes on Venezuelan vessels. The Canadian Armed Forces collaborate with the U.S. Coast Guard under Operation Caribe to intercept drugs destined for North American shores but do not participate in the lethal boat strikes.
The Washington Post editorial board criticized the U.S. for potentially alienating allies over the boat strikes, emphasizing the importance of maintaining strong partnerships globally. Colombian President Gustavo Petro also expressed concern, ordering a halt to intelligence sharing with the U.S. until the strikes cease.
Despite international backlash, the U.S. administration justifies its actions under the War Powers Act, citing the need to combat drug-related deaths in the country. Venezuela, a key transit point for cocaine, faces challenges in its military capabilities compared to the U.S.’s significant naval presence in the region.
While the legality and human rights implications of the U.S. strikes are debated, the international community, including Canada, remains cautious in its response. Concerns over due process and adherence to international law persist as the U.S. continues its military operations in the region.