In the not-so-distant past, MMA struggled to gain acceptance, facing opposition from figures like U.S. Sen. John McCain who deemed it barbaric. Mark Kerr, known as the “Smashing Machine,” emerged in this tumultuous era, displaying a fierce competitive spirit in the octagon while maintaining a contrasting gentle demeanor outside of it.
The film “The Smashing Machine” delves into Kerr’s journey, portraying his rise to glory, subsequent downfall due to a pain pill addiction, and his struggles to reclaim his former success. Kerr’s unwavering dominance in fights contrasts sharply with his aversion to real-life confrontation, highlighting the complexities of his character.
The narrative explores the evolution of MMA from its early days with minimal rules to the structured industry it is today. However, the film’s focus on a specific period in Kerr’s career raises questions about missed opportunities to delve deeper into his compelling story.
“The Smashing Machine” follows a disjointed storytelling approach, presenting a series of life events without a cohesive narrative arc. While showcasing Kerr’s challenges in and out of the ring, the film falls short of providing profound insights or a unique perspective on his character or the sport.
Despite Dwayne Johnson’s commendable portrayal of Kerr, the film’s lackluster script fails to fully utilize his talent, relying on repetitive themes and missed storytelling opportunities. While exploring familiar themes of a struggling athlete and troubled relationship, the film lacks the depth needed to engage audiences effectively.
The enduring appeal of the underdog fighter in cinematic history, as seen in acclaimed performances by actors like Denzel Washington and Robert De Niro, highlights the potential for recognition at prestigious awards ceremonies. However, “The Smashing Machine” struggles to offer a fresh take on the age-old narrative of a fighter battling personal demons, ultimately missing the mark in delivering a compelling and insightful story.
