“Congress Probes Alleged War Crime in Trump Admin’s Drug Trafficking Strikes”

Date:

Share post:

The United States Congress is set to increase scrutiny on the Trump administration’s military strikes against suspected drug trafficking vessels off the South American coast. Both the House and Senate armed services committees have announced investigations into allegations that survivors of an initial strike in the Caribbean were targeted in a subsequent attack. Members from both Republican and Democratic parties have raised concerns that ordering a strike on defenseless individuals after their boat was destroyed could potentially be illegal or even constitute a war crime.

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth initially dismissed the allegations as false and inflammatory but later confirmed a follow-up strike against the Venezuelan boat. Hegseth defended the action, stating that due to the chaos of the situation, he did not observe survivors in the water during the operation.

The evolving narrative from the Trump administration regarding the September 2 operation, the existence of a second strike, the responsible party for the order, and the justification for targeting shipwrecked individuals has sparked controversy. It was only recently confirmed by the White House that multiple strikes were conducted during the operation in question, with Admiral Frank “Mitch” Bradley issuing the order under Hegseth’s authorization.

The legality of the second strike will be a focal point of the congressional investigations. The committees have the authority to conduct hearings, request documents, and call for testimonies from military officials involved in the chain of command. The Republican-led oversight committees have not previously utilized their full authority to scrutinize the ongoing military operation, which has resulted in 83 casualties according to the Pentagon’s records.

Trump has portrayed the operation as a targeted effort against foreign terrorist organizations, claiming it does not necessitate congressional approval. However, legal experts have raised concerns about the lawfulness of attacking individuals incapable of combat, irrespective of their designation as criminals.

The Senate and House armed services committees have pledged to conduct thorough oversight to ascertain the facts surrounding the reported follow-up strikes on narcotics-carrying vessels. Bipartisan actions are being taken to investigate the operation, with promises of accountability and rigorous scrutiny from committee members.

Ultimately, the legality of the military campaign against alleged drug trafficking boats remains in question, with ongoing debates over the justification and compliance with domestic and international laws.

Related articles

“Ontario Stands Firm on U.S. Alcohol Ban Amid Trade Concerns”

Ontario's finance minister has reiterated his commitment to maintaining the ban on U.S. alcohol sales in the LCBO,...

“34,000 B.C. Public Sector Workers Enter Mediation”

The labor dispute involving 34,000 striking public sector workers in the province of British Columbia will now move...

“Lakehead University’s Two-Eyed Seeing Walk Unites Indigenous and Western Knowledge”

Lakehead University is introducing a novel land-based learning opportunity on its Thunder Bay campus, known as the Etuaptmumk...

“Toronto vs. Vancouver: Historic Showdown for Northern Super League Cup”

The inaugural Northern Super League Final is set to be a historic event, with AFC Toronto and Vancouver...