Despite U.S. President Donald Trump’s desire and the social media buzz surrounding it, a separation between the United States and NATO would be extremely challenging to accomplish as neither side currently sees it as beneficial.
This week, tensions escalated leading up to the scheduled meeting between Trump and NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte.
The meeting followed Trump’s recent remarks to Reuters where he mentioned considering withdrawal from NATO after allies declined to support the American-Israeli campaign against Iran.
The situation intensified on Wednesday when White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt, prior to the meeting, quoted Trump criticizing NATO for being “tested and they failed.”
-
To meet next NATO spending target, Canada needs a credible fiscal plan, think-tank says
-
Analysis
Cold front: Inside NATO’s race to secure the Arctic
Leavitt accused NATO countries of turning their backs on American taxpayers who fund their defense, hinting at a forthcoming direct conversation between Trump and Rutte.
Anticipation rose once again, reminiscent of the previous week’s expectations that Trump’s Iran speech would severely impact the Western military alliance.
However, Trump’s social media post on Wednesday was less aggressive, stating that “NATO WASN’T THERE WHEN WE NEEDED THEM, AND THEY WON’T BE THERE IF WE NEED THEM AGAIN.”
The following day, Rutte emphasized in a speech that the alliance remains a crucial partner for the U.S.
An unnamed official in the Trump administration, speaking to The Wall Street Journal on background, suggested that Trump might aim to penalize individual allies who didn’t support the American-Israeli military action.
Former Canadian ambassador to NATO, Kerry Buck, pointed out the distinction between targeting specific countries and undermining