In Davos, Switzerland, during the World Economic Forum, President Donald Trump introduced his new initiative called the “Board of Peace.” This board, which he described as having broad authority, requires a $1 billion US fee for a permanent seat or offers three-year terms for other countries. Trump, likening his actions to his famous catchphrase from “The Apprentice,” recently rescinded an invitation to Prime Minister Mark Carney.
Around 30 countries, including Bulgaria and Belarus, have joined Trump’s Board of Peace, which some critics view as an attempt to rival the United Nations. Trump’s disdain for the UN and its post-1945 norms has been noted by analysts like Yossi Mekelberg from Chatham House.
The Board of Peace, tied to UN Security Council Resolution 2803 endorsing Trump’s Gaza ceasefire plan, aims to expand beyond the Middle East. However, its focus on Gaza has raised questions about its broader effectiveness. Despite inviting key Middle Eastern countries like Qatar and Egypt, the board lacks Palestinian representation at higher levels.
European countries, such as Bulgaria and Hungary, have joined, while the UK and France have held back due to concerns over conflicting charters and potential UN undermining. The Board of Peace’s creation has led to speculation about its impact on UN dynamics, with varying opinions on whether it will strengthen or weaken the international organization.
Despite skepticism and confusion surrounding Trump’s initiative, its endorsement by a UN resolution and the US’s veto power within the UN system have given it tangible influence, particularly in the ongoing Gaza conflict. The Board of Peace’s role in facilitating the current ceasefire underscores the complexities of global diplomacy and power dynamics.