On Wednesday, the conflict involving the U.S. and Israel against Iran escalated significantly, with U.S. Secretary of War Pete Hegseth proclaiming that the United States was prevailing and that its military could continue operations for as long as necessary.
“Our air defenses, along with those of our allies, have ample capacity. We can maintain this engagement without difficulty for as long as we require,” he stated.
Hegseth’s remarks followed his confirmation that a U.S. submarine sank an Iranian warship near Sri Lanka, resulting in the deaths of at least 87 individuals.
“Our efforts to hunt down, dismantle, demoralize, destroy, and defeat their capabilities have only just begun, and we are just four days into this operation,” he remarked.
During the same briefing, U.S. Air Force General Dan Caine, who chairs the Joint Chiefs of Staff, indicated that the U.S. would “start to move further inland, progressively striking deeper into Iranian territory and enhancing the operational freedom of U.S. forces.”
U.S. Secretary of War Pete Hegseth confirmed that a U.S. submarine sank an Iranian warship, asserting that his nation is ‘winning the war in Iran.’ However, the White House has faced challenges in clearly communicating the reasons behind the initiation of the conflict. Former U.S. State Department official Andrew Miller remarked that this is ‘typical’ of the Trump administration.
Broadening influence
The situation intensified as the influential son of Iran’s deceased supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, emerged as a leading candidate for succession, indicating that Tehran was not yielding to external pressure just five days after the U.S. and Israel initiated a military operation that has resulted in hundreds of casualties and disrupted global markets.
As a testament to the conflict’s growing scope, Hegseth noted that the U.S. submarine strike targeted an Iranian ship off the southern shore of Sri Lanka, situated thousands of kilometers away from the Persian Gulf, while fighting continued to cripple shipping in the Strait of Hormuz for the fifth consecutive day, severely restricting essential oil and gas supplies from the Middle East.
The U.S. and Israel maintained their relentless assaults on Iran, with Hegseth asserting that the United States was prevailing.
-
Tracking deaths in Iran, wider Middle East as conflict rages on
-
How long can Iran keep firing missiles and drones?
“This conflict was never intended to be equitable, and it certainly is not. We are striking while they are vulnerable,” Hegseth, exuding confidence, stated during a Pentagon briefing.
However, he admitted that Iran still possesses the capacity to launch missile attacks, even as the U.S. attempts to dominate its airspace.
Caine emphasized that U.S. personnel “remain at risk, and we must acknowledge that the danger is still significant.”
Canada ‘will support’ allies
While in Australia on a trade-oriented trip that also included India, Prime Minister Mark Carney was questioned about whether he could categorically state that Canada would not engage militarily in the Middle Eastern conflict, even if hostilities were to escalate.
Carney reiterated that Canada would not partake in the U.S. and Israeli military actions against Iran but affirmed, “we will stand by our allies when it is appropriate.”
“One can never completely dismiss the possibility of involvement,” Carney remarked.
Carney and his Australian counterpart Albanese were also asked if they were concerned about the growth of the conflict, especially in light of Carney’s recent calls for de-escalation.
Carney stated that while he advocates for a “wider de-escalation” of tensions, this cannot be accomplished unless Iran’s capacity to develop nuclear weapons and propagate terrorism is eradicated.
A U.S. submarine targeted an Iranian warship near Sri Lanka’s southern coast, confirmed by U.S. War Secretary Pete Hegseth in a Pentagon briefing. Sri Lankan Foreign Affairs Minister Vijitha Herath indicated that 180 individuals were aboard the vessel. Of those, at least 87 were confirmed dead, while over 30 were rescued. CORRECTION (Mar. 4, 2026): An earlier version of this video stated that Hegseth claimed this was the first instance since World War II where a submarine sank an enemy combatant ship using a torpedo. In reality, a British submarine sank the Argentinian ship Belgrano with torpedoes in 1982.
Senate rejects motion to limit Trump’s power
Shortly after, a new attempt by Democrats and some Republicans in the U.S. Senate to curtail President Donald Trump’s frequent foreign troop deployments was unsuccessful.
“Today, every senator — every single one — will choose a side,” Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer stated prior to the vote. “Will you side with the American public who are weary of endless wars in the Middle East or align with Donald Trump and Pete Hegseth as they lead us into another conflict?”
A majority in the Senate supported Trump’s military initiative against Iran, voting to dismiss the bipartisan resolution that sought to halt the air campaign and require Congressional authorization for any military action against Iran.
The final vote in the 100-member Senate was 53 in favor to 47 against advancing the resolution, largely divided along party lines, with nearly all Republicans opposing the procedural motion and most Democrats backing it.
War Powers Resolution
The War Powers Resolution (WPR) of 1973 serves as a limitation on presidential authority.
According to the WPR, the president can only engage military forces in an armed conflict if Congress has declared war or granted specific permission, or in response to an attack on U.S. soil or its military. It mandates the president to regularly inform Congress, which the administration began on Monday.
The resolution also stipulates that unauthorized military actions must cease within 60 days unless an extension is granted.
-
Analysis
Why Trump still needs to sell Iran war to U.S. voters
-
Video
U.S. operation in Iran ‘needed to happen,’ Marco Rubio says
-
Video
Trump warns Iran of ‘big wave’ of strikes, does not rule out ground troops
It establishes a protocol for Congress to withdraw military forces from a conflict, and members from both parties have indicated plans to introduce such legislation for a vote this week.
It is highly improbable that this vote would achieve the two-thirds majority required to override a Trump veto, but some legislators stated it would serve to record members’ positions during an election year.
Certain legal analysts believe that public dissent could be the primary constraint on Trump’s capability to persist with the attacks.